CRIME AND PUNISHMENT
23.
CRIME AND PUNISHMENT
While
driving through Germany’s federal motorway Autobahn, I came across a famous
signboard at an intersection: Nuremberg. I suggested to my friend at the wheels
to take a small detour and visit that place. Images of court room scenes soon filled
my mind from whatever I had read about that famous trial of war crimes at
Nuremberg.
Sarcastically
dismissing the elaborate trial as a farce, Hermann Goering, once Nazi Germany’s
second in command and Hitler’s intended successor, had declared: The victor will always be the judge, and the vanquished the accused.
Four charges were leveled against the
Nazi army commanders, officials and others indicted for the holocaust. Crimes against peace,
defined as participation in the planning and waging of a war of aggression in
violation of numerous international treaties, war crimes, defined as violations
of the internationally agreed upon rules for waging war, and crimes against
humanity, namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other
inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the
war. The fourth charge was conspiracy to commit such crimes.
The
trials began on November 20, 1945 at Nuremberg’s Palace of Justice. The Chief
Prosecutor was Justice Robert Jackson of America. In the dock were army
commanders under Hitler and other pillars of the Nazi establishment, including
political leaders and other functionaries, who bullied and terrified the world.
The most notable among them was Goering, the highest ranking Nazi official caught
alive after the war.
Goering
was no ordinary soldier. He was a daring fighter pilot who created history for
Germany during the First World War. For his legendary feats Goering was
decorated with several medals. As head of the Nazi war machine during the
Second World War he had terrified rival nations with his blitzkrieg. But his
delay in bombing Britain earned for him the displeasure of Hitler and his subsequent
expulsion from the party. He was enjoying his retired life in his private
estate when the winds of fortune started blowing against Germany. He
surrendered before the invading American forces because of his fear that the
Nazi secret police might target him for elimination.
In
prison Goering always displayed a rare self-assurance and stamp of his
indomitable personality. Though devoid of any luxuries of life, he made use of
his prison time to reduce his weight and he faced the trial as an energetic but
defiant soldier, showing the world that his commanding power was as sharp as
ever. It was Goering who instilled self-confidence in the pallid, ashen-faced
and toothless generals who faced the trial along with him.
He
resolutely refuted all the charges. One of his main contentions could not be
corroborated till today. The contention that he was totally in the dark about the
horrendous acts of persecution meted out to the six million Jews killed in the
concentration camps and gas chambers. What he had to say was that as one went
up higher and higher it was more difficult to see what was happening down below.
Goering’s friends also took the same defense. They were not aware of the cruel
acts and crimes committed down below.
Who
were these partners? The topmost leader of the Great War could not be brought
to justice. In a bunker in Berlin, Hitler took his own life, shooting himself
with a revolver. Joseph Goebbels, the propaganda chief capable of making a dog out
of a goat, administered posion to his six children and then asked a soldier to
shoot him and his wife. Head of the Gestapo Himmler took cyanide when caught as
he was fleeing incognito to Bavaria. Twenty one leading functionaries of Nazi Germany
were ultimately caught by the allided forces. They included Rudolf Hess. This
loyal deputy of Hitler pretended amnesia during the trial. Though at first it
was thought he was lying, British doctors who examined him corroborated his
contention. The people and the media also believed this. Then came the shocker.
Hess admitted in the court that his claim was only a trick and that he was
capable of testifying before the court. This statement was of no use as from
the next moment onwards he showed symptoms of insanity. No one could understand
his mind.
Nazi
youth leader Baldur von Schirach remained in hiding for quite some time, but
finally surrendered. He had a change of heart after his surrender. He wrote to
his wife that he wanted to own up his mistake in making the youth believe in
Hitler. He wanted to atone for this. ‘Let them hang me after that. ’
The
fiendish style of Nazi operations was exposed in the court room. Throwing
thousands of Jews, both dead or alive, into huge heaps of emaciated bodies and
then setting fire to them, lining up women at the edge of a pit, disrobing them
and then shooting them to death.... Even the perpetrators of these crimes at
times did not have the strength of mind to witness them. Hans Fresh, an
assistant to Nazi propaganda Chief Goebbels admitted to the ghastly nature of
the crimes and said no power in this world or in heavens was capable of
removing his country’s stigma for having perpetrated such crimes. He too had
said those in higher echelons were not aware of what was happening on the
ground.
No
one was willing to accept the contentions of the accused. Goering, who claimed
that he, was unaware of the crimes; himself was responsible for the setting up
of Gestapo and evolution of the concentration camps. It was again Goering who
ordered a deliberate attempt to provoke Jews so as to create tension. After
attacking Jewish households and destroying their property, the blame was put on
the Jews themselves and a fine of 1,000 million German mark was imposed on them.
Goering was also accused of smuggling out art works valued at over two million
pounds from the European cities which came under German control.
The
only person who remained unperturbed in the dock was Goering. The performance
of Hitler’s Foreign Minister Ribbontrop was pitiable. Herman Hess fully
cooperated with the court while Carlton Bruner, who spearheaded the genocide,
resorted to ridiculous canards.
The
most pitiable was the case of Jalmer Schack, Nazi financial advisor and finance
manager. He did not have any other role in the war crimes. When he realised
that the Nazi policies were getting warped, he gradually drifted away from it. He
even complained to Hitler against the persecution of the Jews. He had to pay a
heavy price for his differences with Hitler, because he himself was put in a
concentration camp. It was from here that he was arrested and put on trial.
The
Nuremberg trial lasted 218 days. The total expenditure was about four million
dollars. Truck-loads of documents were made use of during the trial. Ultimately
the court gave its verdict. Death sentence for Goering. But before he was
hanged, Goering ended his life by consuming a cyanide capsule he was carrying
all along. Schack was released. Hess and Admiral Eric Rader got life terms. Albertespiere
got 20 years.
Different
people reacted differently to the verdicts. But there is one question that
remains unanswered till today.
What
the Nazis did to the Jews was indeed a vicious and diabolical crime against
humanity. But when America dropped atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the
close of the war, killing thousands of innocent people, were they not
committing an equally diabolical and heinous war crime?
No
one would accept impartiality in regard to devastations of wars. Goering had
said the victors were the judges and the vanquished the accused. In the case of
Saddam Hussain also impartial people may ask the question: When the war itself
is a crime, is the victor morally empowered to award punishment to the
vanquished?
Comments
Post a Comment